Tuesday, April 7, 2015

Should the Atomic Bomb be Dropped on Hiroshima?

(Credits):

--written by thewriter197
--employed by Ashford University
--Written for a stubborn news professor. He was a tough on the writing work and demanding everybody hand in work on time. There was no exception to it. Everyone had to do their job and work accordingly. He taught the importance of being on time. He taught me the hard way. I will never forget that old man. He gave me a taste of what its like to be a real writer. Its not always easy and fun. Its sometimes about getting to the bottom of things and making sure things work out the way they should. He was one of my professors that taught me how to be a disciplined writer. Also, he taught me you could make a living with it if you you take it seriously.




Title: Should the Atomic Bomb Be Dropped On Hiroshima (1 page article)?


      Was the decision to drop the Atomic Bomb on a Japanese city called Hiroshima the right decision? Some people believe bombing the city filled with people who have nothing to do with the war was a mistake. Others agree with the decision to drop the bomb on Hiroshima. Thinking it was necessary to prevent more casualties to United States’s military in World War 2. I personally believe the Atomic Bomb drop on Hiroshima was a huge mistake. The people working in the cities had nothing to do with the events in World War 2. They were human beings like you and me.
The Atomic Bomb’s nuclear force was too much for the citizens of Hiroshima and Nagasaki to endure. It hit Hiroshima and killed thousands of innocent people. The people were regular, nonmilitary, and working people. About 90,000 people were killed in the explosion and about 40,000 people became injured. In addition, the bomb produced a lasting effect of radiation that caused about 250,000 casualties. After the bomb passed up to the sky, bodies of dead people were put in single lines, so they could later be buried into the ground. Building were destroyed. So many of them. They had people stuck in them as well. People who hid for shelter. Due to the fact that many people in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were dying rapidly, people of Japan were starting to lose hope and about to admit defeat. Furthermore, Japan didn't want to lose more people to this highly destructive and poisonous bomb. I would like to add my own take based on the information contained in this paragraph. America has no right to kill people that were not involved in the war. I am highly against the decision to drop the bomb (Kross, 45).
      To add to the bad experiences of Hiroshima’s citizens, the Atomic Bomb caused citizens experience an infection. After the bomb hit Hiroshima and killed many people, some became infected with radioactive poisoning that caused mutations. The mutations would make people grow differently. It also caused pregnant women to have abnormal children. To add more to the sadness, these mutations are still affecting people in modern times. At the time, people were going to the hospitals in Hiroshima to seek treatment for their injuries that were directly obtained from the bomb. Many patients at the hospital began to develop a new infection called petechiae. Petechiae, is a disease that cause a person to bleed excessively in certain areas that are in the body. Areas of infection showed a pattern of dots in physical form also. Patients infected with petechiae started to lose pieces of hair on their heads. In addition, patients begin to experience some unknown form of cancer in a very short amount of time. Radioactivity caused the patients to die at the hospital. A small number of patients had minor injuries that were beginning to recover, but these same patients died months later. A blood analysis reported these same  patients to have a new low white blood cell count that was never there before. The injuries that these poor souls endured was all caused by the Atomic Bomb (Malloy, 515).
     Something highly destructive happened after the Atomic Bomb was used. Something that should have been avoided for war. Countries started to believe World War 3 will soon occur with nuclear weapons. For example, in 1945 China discovered the Atomic Bomb aftermath on Hiroshima in a local newspaper. A journalist in the Chinese newspaper argued that China needed to develop Atomic Bombs to compete with other countries in future wars. The journalist also argued that Atomic Bombs could win any future war. Rifles were useless at this point. So, China went on a mission to develop their own nuclear bomb. The decision to drop the bomb caused other countries like China to develop more Atomic Bombs. Therefore, any war that might be fought in the future could cause another Hiroshima incident. An incident that might involve killing innocent civilians to have another victory. In my opinion, the Atomic Bomb started a problem where people living in big cities are targeted by nuclear bombs. I strongly believe the Atomic Bomb should have never have been dropped on Hiroshima (Harrison, 101).
     More words of my own, the decision to drop the Atomic Bomb has created a terrible strategy for other countries to use. The new way to win a war is to create a Bomb that can destroy cities filled with people. After the cities are destroyed, the country’s government will probably fall because people run the government. Atomic Bombs are very destructive and cause huge amounts of damage to city areas. If too many Atomic Bombs are used, it could cause many government systems to fall rapidly. Once the government systems fall, the orders and control will go right out the window. The decision to drop the Atomic Bomb has now caused other countries to develop this deadly weapon with the intention to win the war by sacrificing innocent people. Why do innocent people need to be sacrificed?
     I also think there should of been an alternative to dropping the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima. I understand, that World War 2 was looking bad for the United States and that United States was losing many American troops to the Japanese. However, I still think they shouldn't get the civilians living in Hiroshima involved. Thousands of innocent people died in a war for what. To fuel United States’s pride or set an example to other countries to fear the United States? In any event, people should not be sacrificed so another war is won by the United States. Wars happen all the time and should not be won with civilians being sacrificed. Only people who volunteer in war should be sacrificed. I hope future countries will learn a different method to do battle wars, or innocent people will continue to be sacrificed. People that didn't deserve it.
     On the other opposing point of view, the casualty rates of American troops in World War 2 continued to rise and a decision had to be made. The United States decided to drop the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima. A debate was occurring in U.S. on whether to drop the bomb or to not drop the bomb. One U.S. politician believed that if U.S. did not drop the Atomic Bomb, thousands of American troops would continue to perish. United States also thought Japan would come back to the islands and try to take them by force. United States has lost many troops in this war and was not sure if the war was going to be won by them. America has won many battles in the past and did not want to lose the battle with Japan in World War 2. For this reason, a decision was made by the U.S. to drop the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima (Kross, 40).
     The U.S. politician that made the decision to drop the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima was President Harry S. Truman. He believed America should drop the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima to win the battle in World War 2. The president made a judgment call based on events occurring in World War 2. America’s ally Britain was struggling with the German army for six years and could not aid the U.S. in Japan. The Russians fighting in World War 2 was neutral on the Japanese invasion. Some of America’s other allies in World War 2 were under Germany’s control. To make matters worse, many American soldiers were dying in Okinawa City of Japan. The number of casualties were estimated to be 50,800. America has also lost about 30,000 soldiers during the invasion of D-Day which was for attacking German military. America was losing many troops to the Japanese in World War 2 and the war situation was getting desperate. America did not want to lose the war because many troops were dying and their power structure was on the line. Plus, no one was there to help them.
     In conclusion, the decision to drop the Atomic Bomb was a huge mistake. About 90,000 innocent civilians living in Hiroshima were killed in the blast. These civilians included doctors, children, men and women who had nothing to do with World War 2. United States’s politics believed that the decision to drop the Bomb was the right decision but, I highly disagree because people who were not involved in the war were being killed in very large numbers. I understand that United States was losing many soldiers to the Japanese and not getting support from allies, but it still does not give them a right to drop the bomb on Hiroshima. United States was afraid to lose the war to the Japanese and they was afraid of their victory streaks would come to an end. United States wanted to remain in power and become one of the world’s greatest countries. A defeat from Japan would make the United States no longer one of the greatest countries in the world. Fear of losing power drove United States to drop the Atomic Bomb. Fear of losing power, should not decide who is fit to die and who is not fit to die. I believed America made the wrong decision when they decided to drop the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima. At all possible risks, all of the Atomic Bombs on earth need to be destroyed in order to create a society where man controls the world instead of something else or something much worker than man.

  



Work Cited:

Harrison, Henrietta. "Popular Responses To The Atomic Bomb In China 1945-1955." Past & Present (2013): 98-116. Academic Search Complete. Web. 2 Aug. 2014.
Kross, Peter. "The Decision To Drop The Bomb. (Cover Story)." World War II 20.4 (2005): 40-45. Academic Search Complete. Web. 2 Aug. 2014.
MALLOY, SEAN L. "'A Very Pleasant Way To Die': Radiation Effects And The Decision To Use The Atomic Bomb Against Japan*." Diplomatic History 36.3 (2012): 515-545. Academic Search Complete. Web. 2 Aug. 2014.

Should God Determine Right or Wrong?

(Credits):
-employer: Florida South Western State College
-written by tgthewriter1


Truman
PHI 2600 Ethics
February, 21 2015

Should God Determine Right and Wrong?

Is the Divine Command Theory right or wrong? The Divine Command Theory is a theory that is based on commandments that are made by God (Rahimi, 551). God determines what is right and what is wrong for a person to do. The Divine Command Theory can be rejected by replacing God’s commandments with emotions (Johnson, 506). Some philosophers believe that emotions help humans decide what is right and wrong (Johnson, 506). I think the Objection is fatal to the Divine Command Theory because certain situations can cause humans to act differently. The Divine Command Theory is a method that has been practiced for a long period of time, but there is someone who believes that right and wrong are based on human emotions.





According to the Divine Command Theory, God determines what is right and what is wrong (Rahimi, 551). The theory also suggests that God’s commandments are the foundation for eternal truth (Rahimi, 551). Everything that is said by God is the eternal truth. There are no other divine principles that speak the truth except for God’s principles (Rahimi, 551). If a person question’s God’s commandments then that person is wrong.God’s commandments were created for people to know what is wrong and what is right.

Also, the Divine Command Theory is how people determine what actions are right and what actions are wrong (Rahimi, 551). For example, a person stealing from another person is wrong because God’s commandments say that it is wrong for a person to steal. Another example, God’s commandments say that it is wrong for a person to lie which makes it wrong for a person to lie to another person. A person who believes in the Divine Command Theory will only know that an action is right if it is listed in God’s commandments. If an action is not listed in God’s commandments then a person will not know if that action is right or wrong. God’s commandments also determine how a society should judge whether a person’s action is right or wrong. If a person performs an action that goes against God’s commandments then a society who believes in Divine Command Theory will automatically assume that the action is wrong.

There is an objection to the Divine Command Theory that suggests that right and wrong is not determined by God’s commandments but by people’s emotions (Johnson, 506). Linda Zagzebski created a theory that suggested that right and wrong is determined by human emotion (Johnson, 506). According to Zagzebski, an emotion is a perception of what person feels is right or wrong (Johnson, 506). Emotions often start with a motive, which is a reason to perform an action (Johnson, 506). Emotions come from feelings inside humans that can be right or wrong. Emotions can make humans perform an action that is necessary. Some actions are good or bad depending on the intent of the emotion. If the emotion’s intent is good then there is a possibility that the end result of a person’s action will also be good (Johnson, 506). God’s commandments are not necessary if people can understand their emotions. If people have good intentions then God’s commandments is no longer necessary. Zagzebski’s theory on how humans can tell right from wrong based on emotions is reasonable, but is emotion the best way to determine if a person’s action is right or wrong.

If Zagzebski’s theory on human emotions is correct then all humans need to determine if an action is right or wrong is emotions. However, determining if an action is right or wrong is not 100 percent accurate when determined by emotions (Johnson, 506). Emotions are based on perception which is based on what one person or group thinks is right (Johnson, 506). What one person or group thinks is right may not be right to another person or group because of a different way of thinking. Determining right and wrong based on emotions eliminates the need for God, but creates a new concept which is what person or group is more right.

Zagzebski’s objection to the Divine Command Theory is a huge problem because it eliminates the need to follow God. If humans do not need God to tell them right and wrong, then God is no longer needed. If God is no longer needed to control humans, then there is a possibility that God is not the eternal truth and that the Divine Command Theory is false. Zagzebski’s objection to the Divine Command Theory suggests that maybe God does not exists. The nonexistence of God would indicate that the Divine Command Theory does not exists. If God does not exist, then God’s commandments do not exist. It would also indicate that God might have been created by man.

I personally believe that the Divine Command Theory is reasonable in some ways and not reasonable in other ways. Every person has to deal with a different life situation. Depending on what life situation a person has to deal with, a person has a right to commit an act that the person feels is right. Zagzebski’s theory on determining right and wrong based on emotions is very reasonable. I believe that emotions warn humans of danger most of the time. There are times where an emotional feeling that a person feels is false, but for the most part that emotion is telling a human something. A good emotion often means that a human has intent to do a good action or feels good about an action that was done. If humans follow their emotions then there is no need to follow God’s commandments.
However, there is no guarantee that emotions can determine the right action. The Divine Command Theory does keep humans in control, but it only works when humans abide by the rules that are given. If humans do not abide by God’s commandments to determine right and wrong, then humans must follow their emotions to determine right and wrong. But, if humans do not agree to either their emotions or Divine Command Theory, then the existence of right and wrong will no longer exist. In conclusion, I believe that right and wrong is determined by what a person believes and anything less is a concept that has no meaning or existence.





Works Cited
Johnson, Daniel M. "THE OBJECTIVITY OF OBLIGATIONS IN DIVINE MOTIVATION THEORY: On Imitation And Submission." Journal Of Religious Ethics 40.3 (2012): 504-517. Academic Search Complete. Web. 23 Feb. 2015.
Rahimi, Simin. "Divine Command Theory And Theistic Activism." Heythrop Journal 53.4 (2012): 551-559. Academic Search Complete. Web. 23 Feb. 2015.


Paid from florida south western college
  

Humans Cause Harm to Animals in West Africa


(Credits):
-employer: Florida South Western State College
-written by tgthewriter1




1. Report title:  Relative Influence Of Human Harvest, Carnivores, And Weather On Adult Female Elk Survival Across Western North America, Link to Report: http://db07.linccweb.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=86177907&site=ehost-live (Links to an external site.)

2. Report source/authors: Brodie, Jedediah, et al

3. Publication/release date: Journal Of Applied Ecology 50.2, 2013

4. Report summary                        
            Large populations of elks in West Africa are being affected greatly by human socioeconomic conditions (Brodie, 296). Human socioeconomic conditions are changing the demographic of elk’s natural habitat. As the demographic of elk’s natural habitat is being changed, the ability of elks to reproduce and survive also changes (Brodie, 296). Studies were made on the probability of elk’s survival in some states such as Colorado and Utah from the country of United States (Brodie, 297). Studies on elk’s survival rates were also conducted in Europe and Canada (Brodie, 296). Then mathematical formulas and models were created to explain the population rates of elks living in West Africa (Brodie, 297). Studies have shown that wolves, which are a natural predator to elks in West Africa, are able to increase the mortality rates of elks more then humans (Brodie, 301). The survival rate of elk’s mortality rate increases by 1-6% in an elk habitat that contains wolves instead of humans (Brodie, 302). The human socioeconomic harvest on the other hand, tends to reduce the survival rate of elks more quickly (Brodie, 302). Humans decrease the mortality rate of elks by hunting with firearms, running them over with cars, diseases, and causing them body injuries (Brodie, 297). Humans often remove adult elks that are capable of producing a high number of offspring (Brodie, 302). Elks need a high number of offspring in order to survive and exist on earth. Likewise, to any other species living on the earth. If humans do not stop using resources that affect the habitats of the elk population, then the elk species will become extinct. In conclusion, if humans do not limit the amount of resources and machines they use in West Africa, the elk species will be dead.


Paid from florida south western college